Why do you want to rush it? A month earlier than what we've currently scheduled is in 4 weeks. I think the added stress will do nothing good for us, or our community.
In message <b9dd4505-393e-4cc9-953c-30f6d4eea...@akamai.com> on Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:57:45 +0000, "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com> said: rsalz> Therefore, we could have the release done a month earlier if we rsalz> wanted to open master for non-release things. rsalz> rsalz> rsalz> On 3/20/18, 1:54 PM, "Benjamin Kaduk" <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: rsalz> rsalz> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:27:13AM +1000, Tim Hudson wrote: rsalz> > We have been holding off on post-1.1.1 feature development for a long time rsalz> > now - on the grounds that TLSv1.3 was just around the corner etc and the rsalz> > release was close - and then we formed a release plan which we pushed back rsalz> > a week. rsalz> rsalz> I expect TLS 1.3 to be sent to the RFC Editor in the next day. rsalz> rsalz> -Ben rsalz> _______________________________________________ rsalz> openssl-project mailing list rsalz> openssl-project@openssl.org rsalz> https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project rsalz> rsalz> rsalz> _______________________________________________ rsalz> openssl-project mailing list rsalz> openssl-project@openssl.org rsalz> https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
