> Yes, after what I all said previously, it's clear the code could use improvements. I think at least Matthias and I assumed the code about the minimum size was correct and that there was a minimum requirement of 128 bit. My expectation was that the *maximum* would also be 128 bits. I deliberately stayed away from all RAND stuff after the initial PR, because I didn't want to step on anyone else's toes and "hog" the work. I knew others (including Kurt) were very interested in this.
Who is going to ensure that we improve the code? _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project