> Yes, after what I all said previously, it's clear the code could
use improvements. I think at least Matthias and I assumed the code
about the minimum size was correct and that there was a minimum
requirement of 128 bit.
My expectation was that the *maximum* would also be 128 bits. I deliberately
stayed away from all RAND stuff after the initial PR, because I didn't want to
step on anyone else's toes and "hog" the work. I knew others (including Kurt)
were very interested in this.
Who is going to ensure that we improve the code?
_______________________________________________
openssl-project mailing list
[email protected]
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
