In message <20180414194244.ga27...@roeckx.be> on Sat, 14 Apr 2018 21:42:45 +0200, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> said:
kurt> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 09:32:31PM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote: kurt> > kurt> > a. 1.1.0's test/recipes/70-test_sslextension.t has a couple of tests kurt> > that are meant to fail (i.e. if the individual tests fail, the kurt> > recipe is successful). When run against 1.1.1 libraries, the kurt> > recipe fails, i.e. the injection of double hellos didn't get the kurt> > communication to fail, or so it seems... kurt> kurt> This seems to be a test that is very aware of the protocol, and kurt> what should fail and what shouldn't. If you introduce a new kurt> protocol, the things it check might need to be updated. This is kurt> not something a normal application will be doing, so I don't see kurt> this as a problem. Yes, I agree that the TLSProxy tests aren't the most important in this regard. Also note that this part was a side note. -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
