On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:05:05AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> 
> What I can blame them for is being counter-productively pedantic. Forget the 
> RFC language, does what they're doing make sense and improve security or is 
> it just a pointless downgrade justified by RFC text lawyering?

I'm not sure you actually get downgraded? I get TLS 1.2 in all
cases. I think they still speak a different draft version. If it's
boringssl, I think they do 22 and 23 in the last release and 26
(like we) in their current master version.


Kurt

_______________________________________________
openssl-project mailing list
[email protected]
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Reply via email to