In message <[email protected]> on Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:08:13 -0500, Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> said:
kaduk> What's still unclear to me in the current scheme is how I'm supposed to kaduk> indicate something that is (intentionally) API/ABI-breaking and must be kaduk> postponed to the next major release. Bear in mind that we still don't know kaduk> of the release after 1.1.1 will be such a thing or not... Argh! I'm pretty sure I added a label '1.2.0' to do *exactly* that. Apparently, not everyone agrees with such indication... -- Richard Levitte [email protected] OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list [email protected] https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
