We need to get this release out and available - there are a lot of people waiting on the "production"release - and who won't go forward on a beta (simple fact of life there).
I don't see the outstanding items as release blockers - and they will be wrapped up in time. Having the release date as a drive I think helps for a lot of focus - and more stuff has gone into 1.1.1 that we originally anticipated because we held it open waiting on TLSv1.3 finalisation. So a +1 for keeping to the release date. Tim. On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org> wrote: > > > On 06/09/18 17:32, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 05:11:41PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > >> Current status of the 1.1.1 PRs/issues: > > > > Since we did make a lot of changes, including things that > > applications can run into, would it make sense to have an other > > beta release? > > I'm not keen on that. What do others think? > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > openssl-project mailing list > email@example.com > https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project >
_______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project