On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:55 PM Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org> wrote:
> Either we go with semver and totally commit to it - or we stick with what > we've already got. No > half-way, "well we're kind of doing semver, but not really". > +1 I see no point in changing what we are doing *without* getting the benefit of following the semantic versioning approach. Right now things like 1.1.0 with a major API change and 1.1.1 with a major feature update of TLSv1.3 are confusing to those who haven't been along for the journey. Our current handling of version numbering surprises developers and requires careful explanation. Tim.
_______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project