In message <20181007124854.ga3...@roeckx.be> on Sun, 7 Oct 2018 14:48:55 +0200, 
Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> said:

> We're currently still targetting C89/C90 + long long, yet use
> various features of C99 and even some C11 when it's available.
> 
> C99 is now almost 20 years old, can we please move to at least
> that?

I'd like that.  I've just had a look at the compilers I worry about,
and I see no reason any more to stick with C89/C90.

Cheers,
Richard

-- 
Richard Levitte         levi...@openssl.org
OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/
_______________________________________________
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@openssl.org
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Reply via email to