It doesn’t stop us both reviewing a PR. That doesn’t mean we both need to approve.
> On 24 May 2019, at 7:21 pm, Matthias St. Pierre > <matthias.st.pie...@ncp-e.com> wrote: > > > > > <p>In considering approvals, the combined approvals must come > > from individuals who work for separate organisations. > > This condition does not apply where the organisation is the > > OSF or OSS. > > > IMHO an important clarification needs to be made: The rule should not be about > _prohibiting_ double approvals. It should only be about _counting_ them. > I would not deprive people of the right to state their opinions. > > Also, if Shane has already approved, then Pauli should still have the right > to approve, since his approval counts as OMC approval and Shane's not. > > How about using a formulation like the following? > > <p>In considering approvals, approvals from individuals being > employed by the same third party company or organization should > be counted as a single approval. If one of the individuals is > an OMC member, the combined approval counts as an OMC approval. > This condition does not apply where the organisation is the > OSF or OSS. > > > An editorial comment: I think that the amendmend should be made inside the > unordered list, not following it. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_web_blob_master_policies_committers.html-23L72-2DL78&d=DwIDaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b1aL1L-m41VGkedIk-9Q7taAEKIshTBwq95Iah07uCk&m=DYHGYucybgbeMHQn9pS8SBhh_dvJkYrDgKu9gU2l9H4&s=jT3VTidhpkkMAwUuiu_JgqW9mBpD4PP-3Qc8D3KZDdU&e= > > Apart from that: Tim, could you (or someone else of the OMC) please raise a PR > for your proposal? That would make it easier to discuss the details. > > Matthias > >