> For things that are private to that sub-system (sorry, "package" doesn't > sound right)
Neither does it to me, apologies. I was looking for the right word, but nothing except "package" came to my mind. And I was too lazy to search for it in the docs. > Me, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be clearer if we renamed > crypto/include/internal -> crypto/include/crypto, and thereby did > this: > > #include "crypto/evp.h" > > That, to me, is much clearer than the "_int" suffix. This sounds like an excellent idea to me. Matthias