They also correspond directly to EVP_MAC and EVP_KDF types. Would the types 
change as well?
-Todd Short
// “One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet."

> On Jul 23, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Matt Caswell <> wrote:
> On 23/07/2020 16:52, Richard Levitte wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:18:10 +0200,
>> Dr Paul Dale wrote:
>>> There has been a suggestion to rename EVP_RAND to OSSL_RAND.  This seems 
>>> reasonable.  Would it
>>> also make sense to rename the other new APIs similarly.
>>> More specifically, EVP_MAC and EVP_KDF to OSSL_MAC and OSSL_KDF 
>>> respectively?
>> This is a good question...
>> Historically speaking, even though EVP_MAC and EVP_KDF are indeed new
>> APIs, they have a previous history of EVP APIs, through EVP_PKEY.  The
>> impact of relocating them outside of the EVP "family" may be small,
>> but still, history gives me pause.
>> RAND doesn't carry the same sort of history, which makes it much
>> easier for me to think "just do it and get it over with"...
> I have the same pause - so  I'm thinking just RAND for now.
> Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to