Hi all, taking up again the discussion from openssl-project where I suggested to (ab)use the 3.0.0 milestone for release blockers, (see link and citation at the end of the mail), I propose to add a new label for this purpose instead. In fact, I already created the label
[urgent: release blocker] (see link below) and will add the mentioned tickets within shortly. So you can take a look and tell me whether you like it or not. (If not, no problem. I'll just delete the label again.) Matthias BTW: It took me all my force of will to resist the temptation of making a pun by naming the label [urgent: beta blocker]. References: ========== [urgent: release blocker]: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/labels/urgent%3A%20release%20blocker [openssl-project message]: https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/2020-September/002191.html > > > For a more accurate and timely public overview over the current state of > > > the blockers, > > > it might be helpful to manage them via the 3.0.0 milestone > > > > > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/milestone/15 > > > > > > Some of the tickets listed below were already associated to the > > > milestone, the others > > > were added by me now. > > > > I think the 3.0.0 milestone is what we expect to be in the > > 3.0.0 release, not the beta release. That is bug fixes don't need > > to be in the beta release, but if it adds new functionallity it > > needs to be in the beta release. > > I was aware of this subtlety but I thought that we just could (ab-)use the > milestone for > the beta1 release and reuse it later for the final release, instead of > creating a new milestone. > > Practically all of the relevant PRs are associated to the [3.0 New Core + > FIPS] GitHub Project > anyway, so it would be possible to remove the post-beta PRs from the > milestone and restore > them later. (In my mind, I see project managers running away screeming...) > > Matthias > > > [3.0 New Core + FIPS]: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/projects/2