> topic: We should fix the issue described in #16088 for 3.0 After reading #16088, I have no idea what this vote means, so I will vote -1.
Please stop referring to a github issue or pull request as vote text and actually describe what we're voting on. Since this describes a regression against 1.1.1, and fixing it, I don't actually see a need to vote on this. Not fixing it would require a vote. Kurt
