My understanding is: 1) RSAREF is only licensed to be used for non-commercial purposes. Setting up a web retail site with it, for example, is not permitted. RSAREF as normally distributed is also extremely slow. 2) BSAFE is a library that you can use instead of RSAREF and commercial use is OK. But you have to pay for every copy. BSAFE is fast. 3) Covalent Raven is Apache with either modssl or apache-ssl (which is similar) installed. So if your customer asked for Apache with an SSL extension, Raven should fulfill the requirement. If your customer asked for just plain "apache", you have to explain that plain apache doesn't do SSL. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Ross Foard
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Bodo Moeller
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Tim
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Jeff Hill
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? olga
- RE: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Randy Terbush
- RE: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Salz, Rich
- RE: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Paul Rubin
- RE: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Salz, Rich
- While there is a discussion on RSA David Hajoglou
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Dave Neuer
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Dave Neuer
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Paul Rubin
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Paul Rubin
- RE: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Paul Rubin
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Paul Rubin
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? Eric Norman
- Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage? John Fulmer