Nicolas Pomarede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But when I tried the previous version (0.92b), which have a slightly
> different configure syntax (one must run util/ssldir.pl to change the
> location of the installation), it build just fine and all the tests in
> 'make test' went OK.
>
> The compile option used with version 0.92b was
> cc -DB_ENDIAN -D_HPUX_SOURCE -Aa -Ae +ESlit +O4 -Wl,-a,archive
>
> but I think it was the same when compiling 0.93a (I didn't change
> anything, just used what config generated).
Actually the HPUX10 compiler flags did change quite a bit between 92b and
93a. FWIW, 93a and the current snapshot both build and pass 'make test'
with the the "hpux10-cc" on HPUX 10.20 for me. Do you need to install
compiler and/or library patches to bring your system up to date?
Otherwise you could dive in and debug the problem using xdb and printf's to
see where it's failing and what the root cause is.
Using +O2 instead of +O4 as someone else suggested will avoid some compiler
bugs that are fixed in patches, but it does slow down the runtime so it's
not a good solution unless you care more about link time(?). And only use
+DAportable if you really need to run on a PA1.1 machine and you're building
on a PA2.0 machine, since that switch slows down the runtime, too.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]