David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is getting slightly off-topic, but without risking it what options do > US companies have for items such as the SSLwrapper that was mentioned, or > other similar items. Option 1: Wait a year to let the patent expire. Option 2: Use only DSA-based ciphers ("no-rsa" configuration) and lose compatibility with various popular HTTPS browsers. Option 3: Buy one of the licensed products. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Use of Random Bytes from Client and ... Michael Voucko
- RE: Question about Browser Authenticity Geoff Thorpe
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Gregory Stark
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Dave Neuer
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Aaron D. Turner
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Dave Neuer
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Pete Chown
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Aaron D. Turner
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Terrell Larson
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA David Lang
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Bodo Moeller
- Re: What US companies need to know about... David Lang
- Re: What US companies need to know a... Bodo Moeller
- RE: What US companies need to know about RSA Michael Robinson
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Michael Ströder
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Jon Bennett
- RE: What US companies need to know about RSA Samuel Liddicott
- RE: What US companies need to know about RSA Geoff Thorpe
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Massimiliano Pala
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Dave Neuer
- Re: What US companies need to know about RSA Michael J. Markowitz