Taral wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Scott Pasnikowsiki wrote:
>
> > That sort of points to the idea that the Win32 side is not being
> > tested much. If I can confirm this is the case (that -rand is needed
> > on Win32 to gen a cert) then I have my answer. (use a commercial
> > product)
>
> No. It points to the fact that the whole thing isn't tested much on
> machines without good randomness sources in general.
openssl is one of those projects that could desperately use a
commerical reseller/support couterpart a-la redhat
or sendmail (the company)
it kinda mystifies me why one has not popped up. maybe people won't
pay enough for it to make it worthwhile??
>
> --
> Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
