Hi Richard

good idea, some of the apps's perl stuff is interesting it's been 4 years
since my last visit to wall's relm, linux <->ftp <->nt4, visual c++ and Java
do it for me now.

I jump started openssl last week, my focus is openssl client/server for
e-comm single dedicated ssl to authorize.net.  i will release to the group
what i can went i'm done.

as i pick it up, i shall lay it down

whining


----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: win c_print.c hosed on lastest snapshot 04/13/01 * long long
problem


> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (robert)
>
> robert> Just a thought.  Why do u release version's of openssl that u
> robert> suspect will not compile for win32 nt4.  why not try to
> robert> compile at lease once before you release.  some of us are
> robert> trying to get from point a to point b without visitaions from
> robert> the Valkyrie.  if u don't want to support win32 nt why not
> robert> just say so.  give it up to some other mini monopoly and lets
> robert> them compete and see who gets to the Valhalla first.
>
> You seem to be confused.  In the text, you're talking about a release
> (without saying which one) while in the subject line, you're talking
> about a specific snapshot.
>
> The releases we do are usually tested during a release cycle of at
> least two weeks, usually by volunteers out there.  The platforms
> tested on are as many different Unixen as we can get hold on (or
> managed by people we can get hold on), OpenVMS (often, but not always,
> tested by me) and Windows in many configurations (I've done some tests
> on Win2000 using both CygWin and VC++ for the last release (0.9.6a)).
>
> Snapshots are, however, a completely different thing.  They are
> exactly what the name says, a snapshot of whatever development has
> been done during the day.  There is *NO* guarantee that tests have
> been done on your favorite platform, only on the platforms that the
> one working on OpenSSL happened to work on.  For me, that's most often
> Linux or OpenVMS.
>
> BTW, since OpenSSL is a volunteer project, the best you can do is
> simply help us by testing and telling us in great detail what goes
> wrong, and in the best case, you might even join in a patch that fixes
> the problem.  I don't know about you, but to me that feels like energy
> spent much better than on whining :-).
>
> --
> Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
> Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
>
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
> See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to