>>>>> "Lutz.Jaenicke" == Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lutz.Jaenicke> I am not familiar with SMTPfeed, but I am quite familiar with Lutz.Jaenicke> postfix :-) The message above means, that the mail body was sent Lutz.Jaenicke> out successfully. According to RFC821, the body is finished Lutz.Jaenicke> with a "." on a single line. The receiving host acknowledges Lutz.Jaenicke> deliveray with a "2xx queued as ..." answer, than postfix sends Lutz.Jaenicke> "QUIT". The message above indicates, that the acknowledgement Lutz.Jaenicke> was not sent, so postfix does not know for sure, whether the Lutz.Jaenicke> message was received or not. To make sure the message was not Lutz.Jaenicke> lost, Postfix will send the message again. Please check out Lutz.Jaenicke> e.g. http://www.postfix.org/faq.html#timeouts
The problem/lmtp is with postfix, it appears. If some system in the Czech Republic has a timeout, why should I get the repeated deliveries? The software appears not to be smart enough to differentiate the single failing recipient from the rest of the successful ones and requeues the whole bunch. Maybe http://www.postfix.org/faq.html#timeouts has some lame excuse for why they cannot differentiate good deliveries from bad, but the "learn to live with it" answer really doesn't cut it. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
