I need to build apache w/ssl on a separate box from the server. It would *seem* to me to be better to link the web server against static ssl libraries than shared ones for two reasons:
1. it's easier to distributed (fewer dependencies) 2. it *feels* safer - the ssl so can't be modified underneath Apache When I built it with 0.9.6d in August I don't remember having to move the libraries. Regardless, now after building it with 0.9.6g the only way it works is linking with *shared* ssl libraries. David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote: > Uh...actually OpenSSL compile w/o 'shared' by design but... > don't you rather want to say that it worked when you did > './config shared' instead of the reverse? > > --On Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:07 AM -0600 A Keane > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I figured out it was because openssl was compiled with 'shared', >> plain './config' worked. Is there an error in the pcre make >> or is that on purpose? >> >> Thanks- >> Ann >> >> On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote: >> >>> Have you got an answer already? If not, I will answer ;-) >>> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org >> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- .tom ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
