Cool. So you can basically call SSL_read() and SSL_write() as if they were normal read() and write() without having to retry and stuff?
I've done a prototype using this option, and I too have not had any problems yet. But just wondering why someone would not want to use this option. Seems like it makes things much easier. Ed --- Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use this option too and so far I have not > encountered any side-effect. > > Michael > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Edward Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 3:19 PM > Subject: SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY > > > Hi there, > > I'm writing a server app and setting mode > SSL_MODE_AUTO_RETRY on the SSL_CTX. Has anybody > else > used this? Are there any issues with using this? > > My understanding is that by setting this, I can > basically call SSL_read() and SSL_write() as if I > normally call read() and write(). Is this correct? > Or is there more to it than that? If it really is > that easy, why would you not do this? > > Thanks, > Ed > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project > http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
