In message <001501c29ffd$db63faa0$0701a8c0@Michael> on Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:39:31
+0800, "Michael Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mlee> Oh, they are the same files! I thought the time shown on the web page was
mlee> synchronized with the actual file time.
It's even better than that, they are hard links to the exact same
data:
:> ls -li ftp/source/*.6h.tar.gz
518914 -rw-r--r-- 2 openssl openssl 2178314 Dec 8 21:43
ftp/source/openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz
518975 -rw-rw-r-- 2 openssl openssl 2252693 Dec 6 00:26
ftp/source/openssl-engine-0.9.6h.tar.gz
:> ls -li web/source/*.6h.tar.gz
518914 -rw-r--r-- 2 openssl openssl 2178314 Dec 8 21:43
web/source/openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz
518975 -rw-rw-r-- 2 openssl openssl 2252693 Dec 6 00:26
web/source/openssl-engine-0.9.6h.tar.gz
The reason you're seeing different dates on the web page is that the
web page is generated statically, and was last generated before we
discovered the distribution needs to be rebuilt.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
