Stephen Amadei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > Now consider what happens if you're running 512 virtual servers (IPs) > > with 256 child processes. If Slapper contacts all of them, it will > > freeze all your children and you're frozen until the timeouts > > happen. Joe, do you have more virtual servers than children? > > No, my hard limit was raised to 2048 a long time ago. I was running a > soft limit of 600, which is somewhat above the number of IP interfaces. > Right now I'm down to 300, as I thought it might help avoid the problem... > but of course I run out of children from time to time. In any case, I > don't think the server could handle much more than the 600 right now > anyway, and I've never seen more than 300 Slapper log entries together > before the server bound up. Ah well. It was a thought.
> To me, it seems that Slapper is tying up the children alot more than > normal web request children. Hmm... I suppose that's possible but it's not obvious to me what the problem might be. I think we'll have to catch it in the act. I'll see if I can get around to that sometime in the next week or so, but it would be immensely helpful if someone could get a stack trace of one of the frozen processes... -Ekr ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
