On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 10:57:32PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2003, Lutz Jaenicke wrote about "Re: Valid trick to reduce session
> object's size?":
> Since this is just an issue of memory use, and not a new feature, I guess
> most people won't even notice that they are missing this feature - they
> would just go out and buy more memory.
> I really have no idea if anybody else needs this feature - I just thought
> it would be nice for my needs and wanted comments if I did it correctly :)
>
> By the way, if other people are interested, but not enough to add this as
> an official session option, an alternative could be to add a function
> (say, SSL_SESSION_free_certificates) that the programmer would have to call
> explicitly (the manual page could explain from where). This will save the
> programmer the need to access internal structures and "extern" strange
> routines, like I did. But again, if nobody else requested this functionality,
> feel free to stick this idea in the "when pigs fly" drawer :)
I have just bounced this discussion into the Request Tracker.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
