Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:

v2 exists, but has seldom been used in real life...

Never seen in the wild, only in captivity.


kudzu> If the cert is a sub-CA cert then it is not self-signed.
kudzu> Unless there is some quantum subtlety that I am missing
kudzu> here.

I don't think that was a question either.

The answer is that no, there is no way to distiguish sub-CA
certificates from user certificates (i.e. v1 and v2 user certificates
can be used as sub-CA certificates).

If that's the question, there's still a way. If you treat as valid certs signed by keys represented by certs that have no key-usage extension that supports such signing (CA cert), then that's your problem.

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to