On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:56:44PM -0700, Dann Daggett wrote:
> In openssl-0.9.7c/demos/sign/sign.c the comments state (as does the
> man page):
>
> /* Just load the crypto library error strings,
> * SSL_load_error_strings() loads the crypto AND the SSL ones */
> /* SSL_load_error_strings();*/
> ERR_load_crypto_strings();
>
> Yet if I try to load the ssl strings as well by changing to:
>
> SSL_load_error_strings();
> /* ERR_load_crypto_strings();*/
>
> (whether or not I add the -lssl compile flag) the compiler/linker
> fails with
> 92: undefined reference to `SSL_load_error_strings'
>
> But if I change it to:
>
> ERR_load_SSL_strings();
> /* ERR_load_crypto_strings(); */
>
> and add on the -lssl compiler flag, it compiles (and runs) ok.
>
> Is there a difference between SSL_load_error_strings() and
> ERR_load_SSL_strings()?
For the difference: have a look into ssl/ssl_err2.c.
For the comment: signing has nothing to do with the SSL layer and
the comment is therefore misleading. By setting
LIBS= -L../.. -lssl -lcrypto
it should work anyway.
(Hmm, why is ssl.h included for the sign example???)
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
