So is the problem that she has an old distro, or that she is not asking for it correctly, or that she should not be asking at all (that is, those SSL directives should just be removed and nothing put in their place)?
Sorry, I don't do any work with Windows so I don't know.
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
Charles B Cranston wrote:
[...] but perhaps you could name some Windows log file or something.
We're way past this in Unix now because many Unix systems have the /dev/random or /dev/urandom devices - and if these are present OpenSSl doesn't need the RANDFILE.
Not that I'm a real big fan of Bill, but for technical correctness I'd repeat myself that current versions of Windows (2000 and later Service Packs of NT4, and even CE 2.1, if you're lucky) also have an equivalent (? at least I guess so) source of random, and openssl even uses it!
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/seccrypto/security/cryptgenrandom.asp
Ted ;)
-- "An Internet-connected Windows machine is tantamount to a toddler carrying a baggie of $100 bills down a city street..."
Charles B (Ben) Cranston mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wam.umd.edu/~zben
______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
