> Steffen Fiksdal writes: > > > After upgrading to OpenSSL 0.9.8 I received a lot of warnings about > > 'long long' datatype not supported by C89 (I compile with -ansi). > > Which files did you get that warning on (I'd be happy to take a look at a > build log), and what compiler (including the version)? A small detail: ANSI > C is C99 these days (as far as I understand)..
I use gcc 3.2.3 on a Linux 2.4 box. In gcc 3.2.3 the "-ansi" flag means compliance with C89. If this has changed in later gcc's I don't know. I receive: warning: ISO C89 does not support 'long long'. This applies to several header files, among those sha.h: #define SHA_LONG64 unsigned long long > > I guess this is done intentionally (I mean breaking C89? ) > > Not really, but it depends a bit on who tested and on what. With compilers > that don't complain about 'long long' or that believe ANSI C == C99, you > don't get that kind of warning. In other words, it's easy to miss. I'll > happily correct this for 0.9.8a if I can.a I don't know is this is wrong, but my compiler says that "-ansi" is C89 ... Best Regards Steffen Fiksdal ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
