My experience is that OpenSSL usually requires some tweaking to compile under Windows CE. However, I have not looked into the 0.9.8 release, so I can't say how different that is.
In addition to the changes to get it to compile, you'll need to add a source of randomness. I also like to comment out the test to verify that the certificate issue date is before the current date, since CE devices will frequently have the wrong date. Brant Thomsen Sr. Software Engineer Wavelink Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Wang > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 12:17 PM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: What's the state of WinCE support in Openssl-0.9.8? > > > Hi, > > I've actually got openssl-0.9.8 compiled and working on WinCE 5.0. > But I've had to make a few changes to the source code and compilation > files. Just wondering if anyone else is actively using (and more > importantly) testing openssl on WinCE? > > Just to give an example of one minor change I had to make on > openssl-0.9.8. In file crypto/dso/dso_win32.c line 149: there is a > call to LoadLibraryA(). LoadLibraryA is undefined in WinCE. But > LoadLibrary is defined. Is this a bug? Or did I miss something? > > Thanks, > Michael > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
