Hello,
> >>  * TLS header/protocol overhead
> >>  * Cipher blocks and chaining modes (picking the most commonly used)
> >>  * Blocking mode padding overhead
> >>  * Ethernet 1500 MTUs
> >>
> >> I presume the minimum is 1 byte, to be send and flushed at the receiver.
> >>
> >> But maximum block size I read somewhere maybe around 16Kb ?
> >>
> >> So if we were looking in the 1500 to 6000 byte region for a nicely 
> >> aligned SSL_write() size, what are the magic numbers ?
> > 
> > If you want to minimize overhead, you should use records of maximum
> > length, which is 2^14 plaintext bytes (with a slightly longer
> > ciphertext).
> 
> I was thinking in terms of the possibility of optimizing for network 
> layer (than just raw encoded data length, necessary to encode the payload).
> 
> 
> For example, if:
> 
>   * TLS overhead is: 5 bytes
>   * Cipher blocks + chaining alignment is 512bits / 64 bytes.  Some 
> ciphers align at less (down to 8 bytes) which makes it easier to find 
> magic number for them.
>   * Blocking mode padding at 64 byte multiples of payload size is: 0 bytes
>   * Ethernet MTU is: 1500 bytes
> 
> So magic numbers around the range 1500 to 6000 byte region would be:
> 
>   1472 bytes payload (1472 divides by 64 with no remainder, and block 
> padding overhead for that length is 0) + 5 TLS header = 1472 bytes.
Cipher block padding can not be 0, if remainder is 0, one block of
padding is added (for example with 8 byte block - block filled with 8
is added).
Next hint - you must add to this calculation MAC digest size 
(20 for SHA) per SSL record. 

For example if you have 8 data bytes to send:
        8(data) + 20(MAC) + 8(padding) = 36
and 5 bytes for SSL3/TLS record header = 41.

Best regards,
-- 
Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to