Hello, > > parent accept() and SSL_accept() then fork(), parent > > SSL_free() and close() and child to some work. > > What work would that be? It should not be possible for the child > process to splice itself into the middle of an SSL session without > the required cryptographic state... Of course, sorry for mistake, should be of course only "fork" model (not fork/exec). And in this "fork" model by work I mean SSL_read()/SSL_write() and others. Thanks.
Best regards, -- Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
