My error, to be exact, came from an xmlsec signature check call on a SAML token. Xmlsec is also freeware. Most feedback I got from other lists appeared to point the problem at openssl.
I am sure 0.9.7d works fine. In fact both Redhat and Suse released RPMs on openssl for 64 bit machines up to openssl 0.9.7g. This is over an year old. Is there any reason no RPMs released on 0.9.8 or newer?
Thanks,
Terry
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure about 0.9.8 yet, but 0.9.7d works well on the x86_64 platforms. we use no_asm no_idea no_rc5 threads shared. what exactly is the failure?Dave McLellan --Consulting Software Engineer - SPEA Engineering
EMC Corporation
228 South St. Mail Stop: 228 LL/AA-24
Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
+1-508-249-1257 F: +1-508-497-8030 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of T C
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 4:55 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Openssl on Suse 10 x86-64
Hi,I am running openssl 0.9.8. I have code to verify signature The code works fine on about every major Unix platform. However, they are all 32-bit platforms. When I tried to run it on Suse Linux x86-64 machines it failed.I have set my target to linux-x86_64 and turned off assembly with "no_asm" option and also changed options for this target to "-O0" from "-O3". Still couldn't get it to work.
Does anyone know how well this code works on 64-bit platforms, and if there are any patches needed
Thanks,
Terry
