David Schwartz wrote:
/* This is just one of the tests I have tried */
FD_ZERO(&rfds);
FD_SET(acceptSock, &rfds);
FD_ZERO(&wfds);
FD_SET(acceptSock, &wfds);
FD_ZERO(&rfds);
FD_SET(acceptSock, &efds);
do {
/* see if we have any activity on the socket */
waitVal = select(acceptSock, &rfds, &wfds, &efds, &tv);
What happens when you pass 'select' fd sets that make sense and set the
first parameter appropriately?
Dave,
I appreciate you taking the time to respond, but I do not follow what
your saying. If I thought what I was doing wasn't sane I wouldn't do it.
So I'm not sure how to make the code 'sane'?
My original code was just one fd_set for the read case and I passed NULL
for the write and except parameters, but I had the same problem so I
added the write and except cases as a test. Since this is an accept call
that I am trying to make I would expect that all I need is the read
option but since it didn't work I tried something else.
DS
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
