Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Sorry, Kyle, you are correct. I forgot not everyone understands what I meant by PATH in the generic sense.
Also, don't forget crle command for Solaris (9 & 10). For instance: crle -64 -c /var/ld/ld.config -l <NEWPATH_WITHCOLONS_HERE> (i.e. crle -64 -c /var/ld/64/ld.config -l /lib/64:/usr/lib/64:/usr/local/ssl/lib .....etc ) Or for 32 bit libraries... crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -l /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/ssl/lib Those are just examples for Solaris 9 & 10 using crle (as opposed to LD_LIBRARY_PATH). --Warron -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:59 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.8i but (Library: OpenSSL 0.9.8c) (UNCLASSIFIED) Not just PATH, but also LD_LIBRARY_PATH (on Linux), DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH (on MacOSX), or whatever the dynamic linker expects on whatever flavor of UNIX you're actually on. As well, if your binary is setuid, it will prevent loading libraries from any environment-specified locations. -Kyel H On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:03 PM, French, Warron S CTR DISA NS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > Patrick, did you make sure that the path to your new OpenSSL libs > (*.0.9.8) was in the path before the other possible libs of openssl? > Granted under normal circumstances you may think you only have one > version installed, but DOUBLE check you don't have other > libcrypto.so.* and libssl.so.* somewhere in the directories that are > in your PATH (environment variable) before the path to where you > created/installed your newest version of OpenSSL libraries. > > > > --Warron > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of patrick > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 1:29 PM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.8i but (Library: OpenSSL 0.9.8c) > > hi, > > i still have the problem, but i found that on debian etch the shared > librairies are also found in: /usr/lib/i486; /usr/lib/i586; > /usr/lib/i686/cmov; that is: libcrypto.so.0.9.8 and libssl.so.0.9.8 > > make install will only use /usr/lib - so i don't know what to do from here. > anyone can help me installing openssl on debian etch. like, would it > be a better idea to install openssl in /usr/local and hope that when > recompiling apache it will use /usr/local/lib/? > > patrick > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
