On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:33:18PM -0500, Green, Paul wrote: > Dear 'The Doctor', > > I am not on the OpenSSL team so I'm just speaking for myself here. But > I have done work on many other open-source products, so I'm responding > based on my overall experience with open-source development. > > When you find a problem in an open-source product, the accepted protocol > is to boil the problem down to the smallest reproducible test case that > reliably demonstrates the failure and then post just that information. > Posting the entire output of the build procedure is incredibly lame and > completely unhelpful. Posting to two different OpenSSL mailing lists is > also clueless; they have different purposes. If I were a member of the > OpenSSL team, I'd ignore your postings until you took the time to learn > how to add value to the process instead of being a drag on other > people's productivity. >
Well I moved everything to 0.9.9/dev so that is up to the programmers to find the rest. -- Member - Liberal International This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED] God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Merry Christmas 2008 NOT 2o8 and Happy New Year 2009 NOT 2o9 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
