On Wed April 1 2009, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 09:05:05 Thomas J. Hruska wrote: > > The problem is that I was under the distinct impression 0.9.9 was the > > next release and 1.0.0 was a pipe dream a few years down the road (at > > least). > > The choice of a 1.0 release is to clearly mark the fact that openssl is > shifting to a common base platform, namely Java. Platform independence > is going to make future development much easier, but represents a > significant enough change to warrant the new major version. This > decision has been driven by increasing demands to support as-yet > unsupported platforms; primarily Amiga, Z80, Casiotone, and Windows. >
I realize that progress in the security field is slow - but will this new release support rfc1149? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149 That was published back in '90 - it should be well vetted by now. Mike > Regards, > Geoff > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
