On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:17PM +0530, Anil Tambe wrote: > is the binary compatibility broken in 0.9.8k ?
Not necessarily. > i see the below symbols missing from 0.9.8k library .. which were present in > 0.9.8g .. If you compile with "tlsext" enabled (default changed from 0.9.8i, don't know why), 0.9.8[jk] are not binary compatible with 0.9.8i and earlier default builds because SSL structure sizes change. > md4_block_host_order > DES_xwhite_in2out > sha256_block > sha256_block_host_order > sha512_block > sha1_block_asm_data_order > sha_block_host_order > BIO_dgram_should_retry > ripemd160_block_host_order > sha1_block_asm_host_order > _ossl_old_des_xwhite_in2out > sha_block_data_order > md5_block_host_order These are not public interfaces, and were made static. No problem. -- Viktor. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org