On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:17PM +0530, Anil Tambe wrote:

> is the binary compatibility broken in 0.9.8k ?

Not necessarily.

> i see the below symbols missing from 0.9.8k library .. which were present in
> 0.9.8g ..

If you compile with "tlsext" enabled (default changed from 0.9.8i,
don't know why), 0.9.8[jk] are not binary compatible with 0.9.8i and
earlier default builds because SSL structure sizes change.

> md4_block_host_order
> DES_xwhite_in2out
> sha256_block
> sha256_block_host_order
> sha512_block
> sha1_block_asm_data_order
> sha_block_host_order
> BIO_dgram_should_retry
> ripemd160_block_host_order
> sha1_block_asm_host_order
> _ossl_old_des_xwhite_in2out
> sha_block_data_order
> md5_block_host_order

These are not public interfaces, and were made static. No problem.

-- 
        Viktor.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to