On 2009.06.04 at 08:13:05 +0800, jazeltq wrote: > >I'm afraid that it is not a good code to study ecc. > > > >Implementation, which is currently in OpenSSL is full of obscure > >performance hacks and is not well-documented. > Yse, it's a problem . May be it will be relief afer my paper finished.
It would be nice, because this ecc library is fast. I have compared its speed with some proprietary implementations of EC-based signature algorithms, and it outperforms them. Moreover, may be even some of performance hacks worth documenting as good way to improve speed of EC operations. > >When I've used it to implement GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithm in the ccgost > >engine, it took some pain to understand even knowing the math and having > >standard text handy. > gost ? It is the Russia digital signature standard, is't it? > oh, i see "cryptocom.ru" , are you come from Russia ? I've not come anywhere. I'm just sitting in my office in Moscow. ;-) ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
