P Kamath wrote: > I said it is an RNG, not cryptographic RNG. By adding current time > source, > however crude, and doing a sha1/md5, why should it not be cryptoPRNG? > What > properties should I look for?
You should look for a cryptographically-secure random number generator. Seriously, you shouldn't be hacking random bits of junk together and then relying on it to be secure. DS ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
