On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:31:40PM -0500, josh kirbey wrote:
> Thanks Viktor for your quick response. Even I am contesting the unnecessary
> usage of 3072 bit sized key.
>
> Surprisingly, in the given scenario, if I write this line of code before
> modifying the certificate it works like a charm.
Yes, but the signature of a modified X509 object is still invalid...
--
Viktor.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
