Thanks again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael S. Zick <open...@morethan.org>
To: openssl-users <openssl-users@openssl.org>
Sent: Tue, Jul 19, 2011 2:03 pm
Subject: Re: Trying to Link Statically to Libcrypto
On Sun July 17 2011, brandon...@aol.com wrote:
Although I've been programming on various platforms for quite awhile, I don't
now much about the principles involved here - i.e. Linux or static vs dynamix
inking. You are right, it is linking to libldap.
When in doubt, ask Google:
ttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/45135/linker-order-gcc
The first of 6 million answers to those questions.
Mike
What I am trying to do is remove all dependencies on libraries on the diverse
arget machines, so that it works right out of the box without the necessity of
he user installing libraries. On several machines where people have installed
y program, it complained that it couldn't find libcrypto.so.8. I fixed that on
hose occasions by creating a symbolic link to their actual version of
ibcrypto, but I just want it to stop looking for any library at all on the box
here I'm putting it, and this is one step towards that. I had hoped that by
orcing it to take libcrypto.a, rather than libcrypto.so, it would stop looking
or libcrypto.so.8.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Mueller <andreas.muel...@othello.ch>
To: openssl-users <openssl-users@openssl.org>
Sent: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 2:45 pm
Subject: Re: Trying to Link Statically to Libcrypto
Brandon,
Am 16.07.2011 um 10:59 schrieb brandon...@aol.com:
Actually, I believe it said that openldap.so was complaining that they were
t would certainly help if you actually knew what it was saying,
ot just believed it! And wasn't it rather libldap.so, not
penldap.so. Of course, libldap.so is usually provided by some
penldap package.
> I am already linking in -lldap. Will -lopenldap work better?
e certainly meant -lldap (the library is called libldap.so, so
he linker flag is called -lldap). If your library really is
alled openldap.so (which I very much doubt), then you can not
ink it with the -l option, you have to add the fully qualified
ath name of that library to the linker command line.
> > Any idea what library I can link in to define the above two references?
Link to OpenSSL first, and then OpenLdap (order matters):
gcc ... -lcrypto -lopenldap
hat was meant is "-lldap -lcrypto". Libraries later in later
lags have to satisfy references left open by earlier libraries.
> I am writing some C++ on Linux with g++. When I try to link statically to
libcrypto, by using the libcrypto.a library, it complains that
ou are linking statically to a library that some other library,
amely libldap, want's to link dynamically. How's that supposed
o work? Static linking means you have a copy of libcrypto in
our binary, with the symbols of that library removed, because
hey have already been resolved. Then libldap gets linked, and
ants to know about the same symbols once again, so a shared copy
f the library libcrypto has to be added to the address space.
hat a mess. So the real question is: WTH are you trying to link
tatically!
Mit herzlichem Gruss
Andreas Müller
--
rof. Dr. Andreas Müller, Beratung und Entwicklung
ubental 53, CH - 8852 Altendorf
mail: andreas.muel...@othello.ch
oice: +41 55 4621483 Fax: +41 55 4621482
______________________________________________________________________
penSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
ser Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
utomated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
_____________________________________________________________________
penSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
ser Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
utomated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
