On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:24 PM, NuSkooler <nuskoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think responses like this would be much more helpful without the FUD.
> I have no fear since I don't suffer uncertainty. The macros are broken.
>
>> WaitForSingleObject() and WaitForMultipleObjects() return WAIT_ABANDONED if
>> the mutex has been closed. WAIT_OBJECT_0 would only be expected if you
>> didn't read the documentation.
> Bullshit. Write some negative tests and see what you get back. You
> will get everything from WAIT_FAILED to ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE.
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
HANDLE mutex = NULL;
DWORD dwRet = WaitForSingleObject(mutex, INFINITE);
DWORD dwErr = GetLastError();
printf("Result = %d, Error = %d\n", dwRet, dwErr);
return 0;
}
Results in "Result = -1, Error = 6". That's WAIT_FAILED and
INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE.
Jeff
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
