On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Ribhi Kamal <rbhka...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess the next time I see a linker complain about _<NAME> I'll know what's > wrong :) Absolutely. I've done the same many times, and that's why I knew :)
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Michel <msa...@paybox.com> wrote: >> >> >> Found interresting related article from Wikipedia : >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling >> >> "Note that the 64-bit convention on Windows (Microsoft C) is no leading >> underscore. >> This difference may in some rare cases lead to unresolved externals when >> porting such code to 64 bits. " >> >> Le 11/01/2013 01:06, Dave Thompson a écrit : >> >>> Winx86 has two generally used calling conventions, >>> which are distinguished by different name mangling: >>> cdecl has underscore at the beginning; >>> stdcall has atsign-number (of bytes popped) at the end. >>> (Plus several more that are used more locally.) >>> >>> (I've been told) Winx64 has only one calling convention >>> and doesn't need this mangling, so maybe it isn't done >>> or at least isn't done the same way. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
