I can see RC4 going in the list of low security ciphers within a couple of years anyways, so we can better discourage the usage right now.
2014-09-09 18:14 GMT+02:00 Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>: > We disagree. I've got two IETF WG's coming to the same conclusion so > making post-1.0.2 follow IETF practices seems pretty inarguable. > > > The IETF is sadly also prone to knee-jerk reactions. > > True. Some would put perpass in that category. > -- > Principal Security Engineer > Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA > IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org >
