> What I'd find useful would be a branch for me to test with Well, the release doc says our goal is year-end release with a previous mid-year. Once 1.0.2 goes out, I would assume that 'master' will get a lot of activity in that area, and you can try with that.
>Note that I think the goal of minimising the exposed api rather than having >people using the implementation details is a good thing long term, despite the >fact I'm sure it'll cause me short term pain maintaining code using openssl. Thanks. We know it's going to be inconvenient, which is why we're announcing it early and I expect we'll be having an ongoing discussion with the community about it. But the basic concept is set. _______________________________________________ openssl-users mailing list openssl-users@openssl.org https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
