I'm not currently interested in the given platforms, and while I really hope to 
never be interested again, I can't rule it out. It'd be nice to be able to 
follow the discussions, without necessarily contributing. But I also understand 
I if those involved don't want to include those in my position, since I can 
just read your updates, and accept them without knowing all the reasons behind 
it. :) I'm ok either way. 

TOM

-- 
Preserve wildlife -- pickle a squirrel!

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Steve Marquess <marqu...@openssl.com> wrote:
> 
> If you don't know or care about FIPS 140-2 then count yourself very
> lucky and move on.
> 
> In the same spirit of collaboration that underlies all of the open
> source based OpenSSL FIPS Object Module validations, of which the #1747
> validation is the latest, some of the stakeholders impacted by the
> recent "hostage" issue[*] are discussing possible responses among
> themselves. I have been told they would like to reach out to other
> "interested impacted customers". We know who some of these are, but
> there will be many more users of the #1747 validation on those platforms
> we don't know about.
> 
> If you are a such a stakeholder and would like to participate in those
> discussions please let me know (contact info below) and I'll make the
> appropriate introductions.
> 
> -Steve M.
> 
> [*] see http://openssl.com/fips/aftermath.html
> 
> -- 
> Steve Marquess
> OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc.
> 1829 Mount Ephraim Road
> Adamstown, MD  21710
> USA
> +1 877 673 6775 s/b
> +1 301 874 2571 direct
> marqu...@opensslfoundation.com
> marqu...@openssl.com
> gpg/pgp key: http://openssl.com/docs/0x6D1892F5.asc
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
> 
_______________________________________________
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Reply via email to