On 09/07/2015 23:09, Salz, Rich wrote:
OpenSSL is a critical part of security in too many places for us to take on
any unnecessary technical debt.
This is a somewhat empty argument as long as no one bothers to properly
determine if a piece of code is a debt or an asset.
I claim that we are being careful and doing the proper determination.
Consensus seems to agree.
However, it seems that your determination process goes
like this:
1. If you think you know, you don't ask anyone if they
use the feature.
2. If you do bother to ask the customers if there is a
"business case" for a feature, you still ignore all
arguments as to why it is an asset.
Because both methods confirm your prior decisions, you
therefore conclude that you were always right in the
first place.
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. http://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
_______________________________________________
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users