On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:34:03AM -0800, Norm Green wrote:
> Thanks for the workaround. After running your code I now see this:
>
> cast.h -> openssl-1.0.2e/../../crypto/cast/cast.h
> openssl-1.0.2e -> .
>
> Which is still different than 1.0.2d:
>
> cast.h -> ../../crypto/cast/cast.h
>
> Are these new symlinks here to stay or were they included in the in error?
> What will 1.0.2f look like in this regard?
>
> I need to merge 1.0.2e into a vendor branch in svn and I can foresee these
> symlink changes causing me a lot of grief.
The symlinks are not intentional, and it turns out that a test
script and a "pod" documentation file are also missing. I expect
an updated tarball is imminent.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
