I’m interested in the rest of this story.  Does compiling a separate library 
for linking work for you now?  Our product runs on two platforms: one 
Pentium-based and one Mips-based. The Pentium build works fine but the Mips 
build fails at link time with unresolved function references.

From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of 
Ajay Garg
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:16 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Where to find definitions of certain functions

Aahhhhh... I guess I was being an idiot.
I just realize that the recommended/best/easier way is to compile openssl as a 
separate library (enabling/disabling/removing features as required), and then 
link this library to our application-binary.

Thanks a ton Salz, you have saved me a LOT of hours :)

Thanks and Regards,

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Salz, Rich 
<rs...@akamai.com<mailto:rs...@akamai.com>> wrote:

> Also, I am not using Makefiles, rather compiling each "c unit" using gcc 
> using first-principles.
> Could that be an issue?


Only "make" is supported.  You are on your own.

openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users


<table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre>
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Reply via email to