On 01-06-17 16:40, Matt Caswell wrote: > CHANGES is what it is - a list of changes we thought were particularly > worthy of note. If that's not enough information for you then use the > git logs. I see very little value in automatically extracting info out > of the logs and including it in the distribution when the logs are so > easily accessible elsewhere.
It might be useful to make that point at the start of the CHANGES file, then. Currently, it just says "Changes between X.Y.Zx and X.Y.Zy [date]". While that doesn't claim to be complete, the simple word "CHANGES" invokes the idea of a changelog, which should be complete -- and this file is not. If it's not meant to be, fine -- but then it doesn't hurt to say so, and it would alleviate some confusion. Thanks, -- Wouter Verhelst -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
